Pastor Darrio Taylor answers Liesel’s question:

“Why is it that, when explaining Daniel 11:36, a minister can wax eloquent on how U. Smith makes one tiny change (“a king” vs. “the king”) and by that small tampering with scripture introduces a whole new political power into the scheme of Daniel 11? YET, when we get down to Daniel 11:45, the same thing is done that U. Smith can be reproved for – changing one small word, and thereby drastically changing the meaning – “in” vs. “and”.


%d bloggers like this: